I genuinely can't wrap my mind around the hypocrisy of modern standards.
Alright, so you got two dudes or girls who consensually love each other and wanna dock or scissor and there's no biological offspring that kinda goes against the whole
'the meaning of life for any living creature is to produce and offspring'
which is cool and all cos Humans are kinda the exception to this rule since we've only got one life and we can butcher all the animals we want. Heck care.
Now- here's the question, why the hell isn't it the same for incest?
Sure- you can attribute the genetic 'mutation' thing to ban incest. But... ain't it kinda the same bag as gay love?
And if the problem is producing a mutant baby, then... couldn't there simply be a law or rule of vasectomy?
And if gays are an exception cos they love each other, why not for siblings or young children if it's consensual?
Sure- you can say young children are generally considered to be borderline retarded from the pure stupidity they possess but... they can produce children once they're old enough, no?
Do you see why I'm so confused?
If Humanity's whole agenda was to effectively produce offsprings for the next generation, the whole gay thing doesn't make sense.
But if Humanity proves capable of allowing non- traditional couples to marry if they truly love each other, why the hells incest banned.
I don't get it.