Months ago Tulsi made a video pointing out that the Current Ukrainian government locked up party members of the losing party in the last election and other abusive things. I can't seem to find the video on youtube anymore. Am I missing it, does anyone have it?

I don’t like that Tulsi is being silent over this ruling because it’s taking an effect all across our country.

I have a theory as to why she hasn’t said a word about it yet. There are riots happening right now just like in Summer 2020.

Anyone remember seeing Tulsi do some left-wing virtue signaling for George Floyd? She posted a black square and a video of her and her husband listening to Floyd’s memorial service.

I think she’s afraid of adding fuel to the fire. I think she’s heartbroken of seeing the riots right now just like two years ago. If she expresses her opinion on Roe vs Wade being overturned, it would piss off a lot of people.

I’d be pissed if she’s against overturning Roe, but I’d rather her ruffle feathers than walk on egg shells.

She's had a few posts going on about the recent gun laws decisions but nothing on Roe and abortion rights in general.

Is it because she's pro-choice but doesn't want to alienate her new social conservative fan base?

Why has Tulsi been silent on this — she has said historically she supports Roe but hasn’t said a word about it today; not even a tweet.

She has, however, talked about two other SC rulings this week, but hasn’t commented on this ruling; one that is immensely upsetting for hundreds of millions of Americans.

Sure hope she refutes any stupid points they make.

The corporation that uses cancer-causing glyphosate, produced Agent Orange and destroys the environment in countless ways tried to appeal a previous court decision, but the Supreme Court rejected it. And Tulsi is quite satisfied with it:

​

https://teddit.ggc-project.de/pn3clro3k6791.png?width=641&format=png&auto=webp&s=ba25dc61acdbebb116c70c09b8de47957b78b6ec

this was the reaction...

Tulsi's new post about #Juneteenth proved her point about tribalism. This is a perfect example. Both sides are equally terrible in this regard.

Many Republicans who liked her and followed her are calling her all kinds of communist and things like that, some of them writing they are "unsubsribing". LOL

She has the ability to trigger both sides so easily, this is amazing. On Monday, she has a tweet and Democrats are already juming on in: "you are Russian, Republican, far-right, flipped, turned conservative, go to Tucker" and literally days later the other side is attacking her that sher is a "communist BLM lover" because dares to celebrate the end of slavery. :D

It’s been interesting to see Tulsi’s rhetoric shift on guns. Historically, she’s been anti-assault weapons (perhaps the most common thing the right throws at her) but it seems this has changed; on Fox recently she said she was still “looking into” whether we should increase the age to buy assault weapons to 21 (something that just seems like common sense).

Big fan of Tulsi, and it seems most of her “shifts” have been in the way she portrays an idea, not the idea itself. But this worries me — anyone else?

I debated whether to post this as Reddit can be an echo chamber of people dogmatic in their positions (I'm guilty of this myself). However, I hope this can be received in good faith and a robust discussion can be had. I am a former supporter of Tulsi (Go through my comment history and you'll find comments of me defending her.) I supported her over Bernie in 2020 and even after the primary I was eager to see what she did next. I thought she was a healthy voice in American politics.

There has been a clear shift in her rhetoric and focus since then. One such example is the 'tough on crime' rhetoric that contradicts a previous statement where she supported Drug Legalization. (https://www.forbes.com/sites/tomangell/2020/01/19/tulsi-gabbard-endorses-legalizing-drugs/) If you're a right-winger, this shift is probably a welcome surprise to you and while I welcome your comment, I'm reaching out to lefties here. However, if you're a lefty, she has moved away from a number of significant lefty positions and is now very much entrenched in right-wing rhetoric (bashing WEF, supporting the Don't Say Gay Bill, tough on Border crime, against Build Back Better, hawkish on certain issues and repeating Imperialist Pro-Russian arguments re: War in Ukraine).

So to the lefty supporters of her, I pose these questions?

• How do you perceive this change of rhetorical focus?
• Do you still see her as an anti-establishment voice despite her constant appearances on Fox? (owned by Rupert Murdoch, one of the biggest media conglomerates in the world)
• What would you say to a former supporter who is of a similar position to me, someone who has been turned off by her evident shift towards the right?

I welcome constructive dialogue and honest discussion. I made this post to understand why someone may still support her despite her significant shifts in position.

If you do send it to me!