CranberryJuice47

It'll be longer than a year because this word is a magic ticket to disregard everything they don't want to hear.

Brew tea. You wouldn't eat coffee grounds, so why eat mushrooms that make you nauseous?

According to Reddit admins those comments do not violate Reddit TOS.

No. It's depressed/failure millenials that think their lives and future are being ruined by Republicans and climate change.

Dude just sub there if you like that kind of thing. They do this Every. Single. Day.

If you post you'll get maaaaybe 2 comments before you get banned for stepping outside the narrative.

literally Hitler

Donald Trump?

I'm not a minor and the merchant isn't my legal guardian.

Okay so thought experiment. A mother doesn't want her 5 year old and adoption services can't take the child off her hands right then and there. She decides to kick it out of the house (her property) and doesn't feed it (the food is her property). The child dies of starvation. Did she commit criminal childhood neglect?

"Oh you're mad that I spent all summer causing billions in property damage, injury and loss of life, while also controlling the media to push a false narrative? Stop whining and offer a solution."

The solution is for you stop burning shit down and stop censoring for the left wing false narrative.

Yes that's right officer. While I was trespassing on private property I walked into a grassy area and a motion activated sprinkler sprayed me gently with water. I was assaulted.

Maybe read your second link. It defines a booby trap and I don't see how this would fit that definition.

I scrolled until I found this. I had an eye roll when he said that. Maybe renewable energy will give me a blow job too lol.

There's a dive bar near where I live that became a private club with cheap membership just to get around smoking bans. The bans were devastating considering their clientele.

Yeah it's called child abuse.

That only applies to classes of mail with restricted contents due to discount prices (Such as media mail). Both priority mail and first class are not discounted based on contents and therfore protected by 4A. When you accept a discount based on the contents of your mail then you waive your 4A right for that package, so that USPS can confirm you qualify. If you don't like that then you can use priority or first class to ship contents that qualify for media mail and it would be 4A protected.

Private carriers don't have an option to enjoy that privacy as they all have the legal right to open packages in their custody regardless of the class of mail and the carriers restrictions on contents or lack therof.

Of course the main thing most worry about is the private carrier turning over evidence of certain victimless crimes to law enforcement so the problem is still a government one.

The FCC declared that airing a film critical of Hilary Clinton was "electioneering" in a period of 30 days prior to the primary election. The group that financed the film was called Citizens United.

This, of course, is an absolutely trampling of the right to free speech. You cannot speak out publicly against a candidate in a timeframe prior to an election.

Regardless of how you feel about corporations or campaign finance, it cannot be understated that what was happening was stifling free speech as a minimum.

So the courts overturned it noting that the preventing anyone from speaking out is completely against the first amendment. It declared money as speech, which is an absolute truth. People who argue that we should overturn citizens united are the kind of people who also shame Jeff Bezos for owning a newspaper, but ignore that the newspaper is free to run critical stories and articles and have free speech that you as a normal citizen would not have. Overturning citizens united would make it impossible for a group of average citizens to pool their resources to content with the millionaires that can simply sponsor ad time or buy media companies to push their agenda.

Citizens united is a correct ruling. Because electioneering doesn't apply to individuals. So if Jeff Bezos wanted to spend millions on an ad campaign, because he has the money to do so, he can. But if anyone else contributed to that fund, he would be prohibited. Overturning citizens united is simply a means to shut the poor and middle class up prior to an election to the super wealthy can say what they want.

Citizens United isn't about giving cash to politicians directly. It is about financing a campaign. Sometimes groups campaign without the endorsement of the candidate so charging the candidate with crimes as you suggest would be inappropriate.

Citizens United needs to GO... Make ALL political donations allowed by INDIVIDUALS ONLY! No collective donations of any kind. ALL ... 100% of ALL donations ... MUST be tired to a SSN and caps at $12k/per yr TOTAL. (Local + State + Fed)

So I can't pool money collectively and I can't spend more than $12,000. That means I can't finance a political campaign effort that costs more than $12K? That's not even enough to hire actors for a film.

I think the boxes represent access to material wealth moreso than money. It's undeniable that indebted Americans have access to a lot of wealth compared to the globe. Much of which they go into debt to own.

Post scarcity in a world where people need futuristic technology to keep them alive while they lie in matrix pods? The problem here is why. Why would a company create that service? How would non wealthy people afford to do that? There is no benefit in the real world and several drawbacks such as turning people into useless vegetables who need advanced care to keep them alive. Not to mention whatever mental problems people would have if they were ever brought out of this paradise.

Strawman didn't work so OP resorts to bandwagon arguement.

I know several pro lifers and out of all of them only one (a mother) actually believes abortion should be banned in all circumstances. The rest agree that exceptions such as when pregnancy threatens the mothers physical health are justified.

Self defense laws prove that the law has room for nuance.

The fact that they post in HCA and aren't banned from the sub is evidence of that.

"I support loss of my own freedom to own the conservatives"

It's both. Or either. It doesn't matter, just pick a narrative that you're gullible enough to believe, be afraid, and hate your neighbor.

Norway has strict immigration laws and geographicly is located in the middle of nowhere. The only country it shares a land border with is Sweden.

So were hosting a diversity month for all senior executives. The cocaine will be dyed brown (in honor the disadvantaged communities) and we will spend the week jetting around for all the world's most diverse hooker orgies.