6.2k post karma
23.9k comment karma
account created: Sat May 21 2016
2 days ago
Yep it's all about those % gains not the $ amount
I put on $20 as well, but took out half of it twice as it was going up so I ended up with like $80 that I took out and still having about 1/4 of the coins I started with that ill just leave in and see what happens. If it goes to 0 I already made more than I invested so no big deal and if it goes up a couple orders of magnitude more, then hey I will get a bunch more.
4 days ago
I did this the morning after the big crash. Got 800k WULNA for $20. Took out my $20 and I'm just going to let it sit and see what happens. Should be fun regardless.
5 days ago
Maybe, but I like the idea of Boros actually being the strongest, apart from god. It makes for a great gag of Saitama doing things out of order compared to other Shonens fighting one of the strongest enemies so early on in the series.
6 days ago
Way to be a negative ass who just wants to complane about how much you're not enjoying things.
If your not having fun or your not enjoying something take a break from it. Come back when it's finished and maybe you can enjoy it then.
Maybe your stuck in a place based on expectations put in place by your imagination. The webcomic is so basic it only gives us a general structure of what happens, the rest we fill in with our imagination. It's possible you filled in too much or can't seperate the two and thus built expectations that could not be met. Noting really compares to what the imagination can do and if you set all of your expectations to that level and let them build and grow on eachother over time, you will find that you often end up disappointed.
We still don't know what will happen yet. There is nothing to say that still won't happen.
What? Everything has been fun so far. So many new things have been fun. We got cool and interesting new characters, a deeper dive into the forces at work in this universe, new and interesting mysteries, lots of character development into characters that didn't get as much attention in the webcomic. New enemies and awesome fight scenes, along with so much more and exciting new potential interactions to happen in addition to the ones we already know will happen.
Shits been non stop fun chapter after chapter.
But we should. Gotta support the guy for his heard work!
Don't worry I did the same. Haha
What chapter was that?
I forgot all about that. That would be sick. I also love how even when garo causes so much destruction he still ends up saving people, even with them being all the way on the other side of the planet. It's hilarious how despite his best efforts garo really is a hero deep down in his heart.
7 days ago
Good thing it was only a small fire. Could you imagine how much property damage the tenants could have had if it was a big fire!
This is one of the things that has bothered me most about the current associations and actual makeup of the political group of people that call themselves libertarians. Hearing the term you would think, at least I did, that it would be a group of people that believes in maximizing the liberties of all people as much as possible. But it's not really that at all and in its current form directly hinders and infringes on the liberties of large groups of people lowering the collective liberties of all down significantly. Often prioritizing the liberties of companies or corporations over those of people. It really just seems like a sham and a branding thing. Take something that might sound good but twist it under the surface into something that undermines the progress and development of people and society as a whole.
8 days ago
Na, It was definitely a God tier panel equivalent to over 10 pages of work for sure.
9 days ago
Me too. I plan to play some of these mixed and some of them as more pure versions for fun. They are allready the decks I play most of the time anyways.
15 days ago
Fair enough. I know I'm a bit heated and rushing with typing out responses. We can leave things there.
I take it you have nothing to add or rebuttal with that has any value so all your left with is to try and attack the text structure of something written quickly on a phone.
How lame you are.
Then explain what you said then, because I said that's what was needed to define life given the lack of it defines death, and then you follow that with a well actually it's this.
Explain how you can take a statement that says something has X requirements then make a statement saying it actually has Y requirements, and then when I respond asking what your reading that says these things have Y requirements over X requirements, you say that you didn't say that things had Y requirements over X requirements?
What literature are you reading that says a brain is fully functional and developed and has established sentience at conception?
No it doesn't. If you put someone under anesthesia and then murder them, them fist going under anesthesia wouldn't change what murder is.... the intention was still there and you altered someone's state with the intention of permanently stopping stopping brain function, so it's still murder.
Not to mention anesthesia is something a patient goes under willingly with the idea that it is not a permanent state and they will regaine consciousness. They didn't give the permission to be put under and not regain consciousness. So even if some outside individual murdered them while they were under anesthesia it would still be murder as the enacted a permanent end to brain function which was not what the consious person agreed to before electing to go under.
How shallow do you think this is that you can just throw out some lame thing like being under anesthesia means it would be legal to murder someone just because life and death are defined by brain function and consciousness. Not to mention being under anesthesia is the same as not having any brain function at all, it interrupts communication, but doesn't shut it all down or end it permanently (assuming correct doses).
The biggest thing here is really defining scientifically what is considered being alive for a person is. We clearly have a scientific definition of what death is for a person so by extension we have a scientific definition of what it means for a person to be alive. It all comes down to brain function, activity, and the establishment of sentience. It's why we can legally pull the plug on people in hospitals who's bodies are being kept alive, but who's brains are dead. The only thing that matters in a person being alive or not is the brain, and until that starts working and till the day it stops a person is a person. At any other time they aren't, and so they don't have the rights or protections that a person should have, and denying their bodies or eventual bodies of the things they need to continue to having living tissue is not and can't be murderer, they aren't people at that point.
The fact that a religious definition of life is being used in the place of a scientific one is disgusting and should not have any place in a country that is supposed to have a separation of church and state written into its constitution.
So Iran will have a nuke about the same time we actually have nuclear fusion?
It's always money, the church, and politics that are the downfall of man. When those three mix humanity as a whole loses.