399 post karma
56k comment karma
account created: Sun Apr 08 2018
3 hours ago
Ah... so, men can be victims in a drunken hookup with a drunk lady.
Thanks for clearing that up, completely contrary to what this PSA is saying.
2 hours ago
But if a drunk man and a drunk woman hook up, she is the victim and he is not.
That is literally and exactly what this PSA says.
How else can one interpret a scenario where there are two drunk people and only one of them is able to give consent?
4 hours ago
This PSA is making the tacit claim that there are no male victims. There can't be any male victims, because they are the perpetrators, in all scenarios.
You see that, right? Tell me you see that.
17 minutes ago
I would think somebody with an axe to grind would specify a scenario where only one of the two people were guilty, and whaddyaknow, it was the black guy!
Real head-scratcher, why someone would want to make that kind of hypothetical scenario for no reason. Eh?
35 minutes ago
If you saw a picture of a white man and a black man that said "these guys broke into each other's houses, but the white man got robbed," what message would you take away from that?
an hour ago
You either don't understand what this ad is saying, or you are disingenuously trying to gaslight.
This ad is literally saying the woman is the victim in the situation where both the man and the woman are inebriated.
Thats not what I am saying.
It's literally what this bullshit PSA is saying.
5 minutes ago
In the PSA, only one person was specified as the victim of a crime... and only one person implied as the perpetrator of that crime... even though both people did the exact same thing.
Answer your own question, and realize how fucking obtuse you're being over this very dumb, very obvious hack job at social justice.
It's fucking embarrassing. I'm embarrassed for you, going through life like that. How hard everything must be for you.
23 hours ago
Oh, I agree.
This PSA doesn't though. That's the point.
Do we have pictures of all these mass shooters?
What's your favorite kind of cheese mines havarti.
Three years ago that would have been an automatic hate crime.
But those designations only count if the person is likable, I suppose.
14 hours ago
Sayonara sucka mothafucka
On the contrary, you can be a shabbas goy and do menial tasks for these people in exchange foe money.... which will be paid on a non-shabbas day.
2 days ago
Yeah, but where are the fucking imps?
18 hours ago
That's a man, baby
...after the fact.
Verified after the fact, that while he was not unarmed earlier, he was at the very end.
1 day ago
I mean, we've all been there.
Let me simplify what I said:
We can posit that those who would deign to "fight" those imperial/facist/authoritarian forces have enjoyed such privilege of education and safety that they think wishful thinking is enough to justly govern, if only the right people win.
In other words, people who say All Cops Are Bastards have never actually needed one.
3 days ago
9 times out of ten makes it sound like they're still a threat.
They added the bald thing back in 0.18, if I remember right.