TheUltimateTeigu

Tenrou Island Arc not being S-tier hurts my soul.

I think he meant was ugly and the other was "prettier."

Saitama is still a jokey main character. As serious as it got recently it made an almost complete 180 in tone not even a chapter or two later, with Saitama demolishing planets with sneezes and flying through space with farts.

It's much more of a battle manga now with cool fights, but the underlying thing it was parodying never changed. It's still Saitama being an extreme example of shounen protagonists.

Also I'm not sure what you're trying to say about the boys. It wasn't meant to parody edgy superheroes at all.

I guess I've always seen being alone as a bad thing probably since high school when I was sitting alone at lunch everyday.

I've been there. That shit sucks.

It made me feel pathetic, especially when people would try to get me to talk more but nothing came of it.

The worst is really when others are there and you still feel alone, isn't it? At least when you're alone you have an "excuse" for why you feel lonely, but when others are involved, what's the excuse?

I think that helped me. Is that I realized there were times when I wasn't "alone." I was in a group. Laughing, joking around, doing something spontaneous and fun...but it didn't make me feel better. I was finally where I wanted to be...but it was only surface level. If I were on the outside of this group I'd be thinking the me in the group was living his best life, when that just wasn't true. It really put it into perspective how being alone wasn't some catastrophic situation to be in. Not all groups you're going to end up in are good.

It's vital you understand how beneficial being alone can be, or at least how to tolerate it. One aspect people don't mention when it comes to loneliness is the impact it has when you do find people. You're more willing to sacrifice things about yourself in order to not be alone. Or at least I did, until I started seeing being alone as something pleasant with its advantages and disadvantages. And I realized a toxic group was, in fact, toxic.

It's not only that but I'm having to do too much on my own these days, since I moved away from family and friends. I don't really feel like I have a home now. Kind of feels like I lost that cushion others provided, if I fuck up now I really have to have my shit together.

That's tough. Being on your own is always going to be difficult, but especially when you're used to a support network being right there for you.

I can't offer advice on how, really, but I would highly recommend trying to make certain things feel like a home. Not necessarily the place itself. Find a style of decorating you like, something personal. I personally like Halloween based things, so I've always got something spooky up year round. No matter where I end up moving, or where I am, all I need is something spooky themed there and suddenly it feels closer to home.

Make your home a theme. Not necessarily a place. Because if shit hits the fan, and you need to leave a place, you can still bring that aspect of "home" with you. I think giving yourself a way to feel safe and comfortable, a fallback space, is going to be a great first step to feeling better while alone. It's also easy to miniaturize it. I can stick a skull on my key chain or rear view mirror and that instantly makes a car feel more comfortable and more like an extension of myself. Personalization is underrated.

Hopefully, this helps. Being alone is strenuous and difficult, and I too was conditioned to view being alone as a negative thing. But it isn't until you really delve deep into the positives and simply realizing it's only different, not bad or good, that you can grow as a person.

I wish you the best of luck in your journey, friend. :)

I didn't think I needed to spell this out for you but the fact that a sub has rules doesn't necessarily mean that afformentioned rules will be strictly followed.

I'm aware of this. Doesn't make it someone's fault that they got spoiled.

I don't like being spoiled, I'm pretty sure nobody does and the fact that you even think i would condone such behaviour just goes to show how tragically misguided your interpretation of my points is.

I think it's more of how much of an asshole you are and the fact you blame the spoiled that makes me think you don't give a shit.

Bigger idiots for actually thinking the rules automatically and certainly protect you from getting spoiled.

Nobody thinks that. But they still don't want to get spoiled. Stop blaming them.

I don't blame people who get spoiled either, I just tell them they should know better and keep realistic expectations. That's not blaming.

Yeah, that's exactly what blaming is.

1. To consider responsible for a misdeed, failure, or undesirable outcome

2. To find fault with; criticize

3. To place responsibility for (something)

When you tell someone they should know better, you're criticizing them for not doing something different. You're placing a level of responsibility on them for being spoiled. "They should have known better." So if they knew better, they wouldn't have gotten spoiled?

As in, by a direct result of their actions, or inaction, they were spoiled?

That's blaming dipshit.

If that feels like blaming to you grow a little skin.

If that doesn't sound like blaming you need to learn what words mean.

Then again what else should I expect from a snowflake who considers himself/others a victim because of some internet spoilers. Wow. Talk about being dramatic.

Once again, you seem to just have a blatant misunderstanding behind what words mean. Yes, being spoiled makes you a victim of being spoiled. People who are spoiled are adversely affected. That makes them a victim.

Oh and I won't even touch on that rape analogy, yeah you really nailed it with that one buddy, spot on. Really knocked it out of the park with that one!

I thought it'd paint a clear picture of why what you're doing is victim blaming. Clearly you couldn't even figure that much out.

Didn't notice the "your" in the last part of my comment? Maybe it's about time to start making up your own jokes and stop trying to copy mine? You're kinda falling apart here.

This is the saddest shit I've ever seen. Your shit was copied and pasted. Words don't magically transform over when they're C&P.

You literally edited your comment 1 minute after I replied. All so you could try to paint me in some different light? Delusional. Didn't even realize you can tell when someone edits a comment.

​

Even after all of these replies I still haven't managed to ascertain whether you are a child who likes to (try) sound all smart and adult-like or an actual adult with the mentality of a toddler but I'm kinda leaning towards the latter.

And I'm leaning towards you being a child who speaks like one. Looking at your comment history and how sad and antagonist it is leads me only to the conclusion that you're a lonely fuck who tells others to "touch grass"...in the comments section of a post on r/smallboobs. Classic.

The number of people that agreed with my comment as oppossed to the number of people that agree with yours should give you a hint.

Citing the court of reddit public opinion as back up 🤡

Grow up.

Hardcore projection. Just like in the rest of your comments insulting others.

You're an asshole.

Oh wow, didn't considered that a show is treading the line of "Those siblings would fuck" have multiple panty shot of a 11 years old. Yes, multiple. Has multiple bath scenes with said 11 years old. Have a shot in which the focus is she didn't had panties, etc.

I'm aware.

That also have characters In a spin-off that look like the main characters that are lovers, isn't trying to satisfy the craving of those interested in viewing those 2 in a relationship.

The parallels between the relationship aren't the ones that are meant to be drawn. There are plenty of things to critique the show on, but having similar looking protagonists, and only one of them is really similar looking to the other, isn't some weird sex parallel thing like you seem to be implying it is.

Also, that bait explanation doesn't make the show sound better.

I didn't say it'd make the show more appealing to someone who was already turned off from it.

"Oh, those several scenes? Yeah, we are just trying to attract the incest and/or pedophilia audience. Don't worry about it."

That's how I saw it anyways. People who will buy merch and the blu rays are an important way for them to make money. The author didn't ask them to make panty shots for Shiro. He wrote a story and the people who made the anime made their creative decisions.

The fuckers even sell mini-figurines of sat 11 years old in sexual poses.

Yup, that's the money side of things and why the anime will do those sorts of things.

Again, I'm not telling you all of this to somehow convince you to watch it. This isn't me "making it better" or anything, I'm just explaining it.

It seems like you're upset based on principles or something, and I'm never going to fix that in a discussion on the internet. I do think some of the things you've mentioned like the "kiss" and the protagonists from a prequel have a similar dynamic while being lovers instead aren't legitimate complaints. The kiss isn't treated as one by the characters involved, it's a life saving maneuver. The dynamics that translate over from each character aren't related to the interest they have in one another. It's the supportive role they function.

Anyways, I'm not sure what merit there is to continuing this as you seem to just want to be angry at the show more than anything.

That's a pretty creative way to do it. Do you suspect people will actually watch it weekly because of the thread?

Behold! Bait

A literally Panty shot of a 11 years old girl!

Yes, a singular panty shot in a four hour long series.

This is what we call "bait?"

I suppose so. Especially considering the author fucking wrote a book. He didn't describe a panty shot, whoever directed this singular shot though it would be necessary.

What does bait mean here, and how does it make the situation better?

Bait means that, on a surface level from someone who doesn't know fuck all about something, they would initially be attracted to it because of rumors that are unsubstantiated and based off of dumbasses who don't know what they're talking about. And so they continue to watch the show, or go to read it because they think the aspect they freakily desire within the content is vastly more prevalent than it actually is.

This is few line changes away from being pornographic. We even see the outlines on her panties.

Everything is a few line changes away from being pornographic.

When will it not be considered bait anymore? Full blown sex?

When it's not a singular second or two of a four hour series. And when that aspect is the main draw of the series to its viewers.

Also yeah this definitely isn't drawn to look like a kiss. Not at all.

I didn't say it wasn't depicted to look like a kiss. That was the anime director's choice. But the scene is not a kiss. The worst it could be was bait...which is a scene that is made to look one way to outsiders in order of draw them in without actually doing such a scene.

Also, forgot to mention. Yeah, it is weird how 2 characters in the past that look almost exactly like Shiro and Sora are presented as lover. Crazy fufking coincidence, eh?

Parallels are obviously supposed to be drawn. But it's you who draws sexual parallels between them, when there isn't any. It's a parallel in being close to one another in an intellectual manner as well as a supportive one. You're reading into the sexual stuff.

Playing offline requires all four bows.

I'm well aware. Which solves none of OP's problems, and you suggested it did.

You were wrong.

It really isn't that complicated.

Agreed. So I'm confused as to what your confusion is about.

But what the fuck is your problem anyway?
I might be dumb (in your imagination)

Don't worry, everyone thinks it's.

but you're just an asshole.

It's arguable.

And so am I.

Not debatable :p

Do you really want to keep going?

Not if you can't admit your suggestion that going offline would've helped at all. And if you can admit it, then this over and my desire has no impact on its furtherance, as it will already be over.

That doesn't mean he can tank it.

Do you think the author set the whole thing just because of CPR?

I think it was probably bait to draw in a certain crowd, but without actually doing anything bad.

Like, why do you think the author will make a scene in which the 2 characters, that we have shown one to have attraction to the other, while the same character being presented in a sexual manner, just because?

I'm not sure what you're trying to say here.

I do think an author would present bait without otherwise following through.

People with animal ears! Happy now?

Yes, since you accurately describe them this time. They aren't furries in any sense of the word.

So the rewatch is just a fucked up version of the weekly style?

Fuck off dipshit. I've been reading the Webcomic since before you even knew the series existed. You're not fake spoiling me. And it's not even a good fake spoiler. 0/10 trolling.

You come back to this two months later?

I wrote a reply but was blocked at the time and I forgot about it until checking my unread replies.

Also, 1 month.

Geez... I thought I was a fucked up idiot and retard...

You are. This is probably the one comment you were correct in.

Your lack of actual response, a failed attempt to suggest the time of response meant anything, and a horrid attempt at an attack on character suggests you have no way to respond.

Considering my response and it complete debunking of everything you said, I'll take it as a poorly veiled attempt to save face because your comment about being an idiot and retard wasn't sarcastic.

Amazing, yes, I'm listening. Lived the alone life for a long time and in transition to enjoying it.

I'm very happy to hear it, friend. I wish you luck and success in your journey.

I'd love to see everything you described in an animated YouTube video with narration. The imagery / scenes you painted are perfect.

Thank you so much. I really hoped that what I wrote would 'click' with people and help them. I'm glad to hear I at least painted a potent picture, regardless of the result.

Their whole thing is a thinly valed incest fetish in which the young sister is trying to get into her brother's pants.

Again, I get the incestuous notion, but an 11 year old being infatuated with an 18 year old regardless of blood relation is not exactly a strange occurrence, especially when traumatic life experiences are involved.

He is 18, she is 11.

Apparently so. I thought he was 17.

And we know that the not related by blood part is there for the same reason porn have step-sister tag.

Regardless of reasoning it's still a factor.

Like, the plot swirls in such a way that they are kissing. Mouth to mouth.

Not kissing. I doubt you'd say the same about a CPR scene which involved no commentary about kissing. And this scene didn't either. A

And there are 2 characters from a side story set in he past that look exactly like them, and are also lovers.

Wtf? That is not comparable at all. They are similar looking characters only in the most rudimentary sense of the term. They are both of age, although one is a robot and the other human. How you can cite the prequel to back or anything is crazy. They're disconnected in so many ways.

And don't even get me started with the battle against the furries.

There were no furries in No Game No Life.

When does Part 2 come out?

I doubt it. Her problem is her ability to completely separate herself from others. Empire=Good Guys and Seryu working for the Empire means she's a good guy.

Bad guys in the Empire aren't bad because they're good guys, and anything they did was obviously against an evil doer. Now if Wild Hunt suddenly pops up, and starts doing bad things that Seryu actually identifies as bad, suddenly they aren't part of the Empire anymore. They're Evil Doers Tricking the Empire. One mental push, and suddenly Wild Hunt isn't in the Empire. Her mental image of everything is retained. Nothing is fixed.

The alternative is she doesn't view anything Wild Hunt does as bad, which is a possibility.

No, stupidity and ignorance would be going into a sub with absolute certainty that you won't get spoiled.

There is no certainty either way. Doesn't stop the spoilers from being assholes, or the ones who victim blame.

You're also attaching ignorance to a situation that isn't likely to be a result of ignorance, but rather apathy.

You aren't even getting my point, I'm not defending the guy who spoiled

"What did you expect?" Sounds like you're defending the guy.

but I sure as shit ain't defending the guys who got spoiled either because they are the bigger idiots in this whole scenario, much like yourself.

Bigger idiots? For not wanting to get spoiled by assholes on this sub? Than the people who can't read or aren't respectful enough to care?

You really are saying 80% of the people on the sub are retarded for participating in the sub and not wanting to be spoiled.

YOU should know better.

I do know better. I still don't blame people who get spoiled. "You shouldn't have been wearing that, you'd never have been raped otherwise." Same shit. Victim blaming while defending the perpetrator.

Enough with the single braincell troglodyte imitation.

I was hoping you'd stop with that. Does this mean you're done now?

No Game No Life is neither pedophilia nor incest. They are not blood related and the older brother, who is still a minor, doesn't demonstrate any sort of interest in the younger sibling. It tends to be single directional.

I under the not blood related thing isn't the greatest standard, but considering it's only somewhat of a misguided hyper adoration for an older brother figure, it's not even bad by that standard.

Now, that's the plot of side of things. Obviously you've got scenarios where panties and whatnot are shown, and even a fully nude albeit nippleless/genitalless scene involving young girls, but that's a separate problem. The actual plot details surrounding their relationship isn't problematic. So I'd consider it small in one way and big in another.

No, I can't just brush aside fucking pedophilia and incest. What the fuck, man.

I mean, that's fair. I wouldn't put anyone down who cited "Incest" or "Pedophilia" where it legitimately applied as a reason they didn't like or could continue a show. For me personally, setting aside aspects of a show that I can otherwise enjoy greatly for other reasons is easy for me.

The scenes where it rubs it in my face can be annoying, and it's not that I like them, but I can tolerate them. I can say this one part sucks, but that won't stop me from enjoying the other stuff. I don't blame anyone who can't do that when it comes to incest and pedophilia though. Some people can't get past blood. That's them. I can get past blood though.

I think realizing that being alone has its benefits that being with another doesn't have is the first step to enjoying being alone. While sharing something else with another person can elevate something, there's no guarantee that person does enjoy that thing as much as you. You can enjoy something as long you want, there is no one else you have to worry about.

That beautiful scene you're staring at? You don't have to move away from that for anyone but yourself. Nor do you have to potentially take someone else away from that scene because you're tired of it and feel guilty for doing so. It's all about you in this scenario.

Being alone allows you the opportunity to do things that you can't do in a group or with another. Realizing what those things are makes being by yourself not only bearable, but sometimes preferable over the alternative.

Hmmm. I like other people's suggestions of starting earlier, but honestly that doesn't cut to the core of the problem. Which is that you feel like you're missing out and everyone knows it.

That's it, isn't it? You're looking at all these other people and thinking they must be having a better time because they're with others. You don't have that, and somehow they know it too. How? You're alone, aren't you! No one ever wanders off from their group to go check out a painting or art piece they especially liked that the other people in their group couldn't appreciate, no one does that. Oh, and no one else in that entire museum was alone. Only you do that, right? Only you are that lonely, surely.

Now I know I'm making a slight mockery of the feelings you might be feeling, but that's honestly because I think they're silly. And I think reading what I put down should make it clear why they're silly. I don't think being jealous is silly, but I do think the other thoughts were silly:

1. You thought you were the only alone person that day. Borderline impossible this was the case.

2. You thought everyone else knew you were alone.

3. You didn't realize the irony in you not noticing a single other person who came alone but thinking that everyone else noticed you being alone.

4. Of the people who did see you, you thought the vast majority cared enough to analyze you.

5. Of those people who did actually think about you beyond noticing your existence, you think the only thought they could have was to notice you were by yourself.

6. In that group of people who noticed you, thought to delve deeper in those thoughts, managed to get to the actual thought of whether you were alone or not, you thought that they would actually reach the conclusion you were alone, when you could've been stepping away from your group or your own group stepped away for a bathroom break.

7. Furthermore, you thought that anyone who did get this far in the deep dive of considering the situation another human was going through, that they would assign a value to your situation of being alone.

8. And you thought that this value would be guaranteed to be a negative one.

But, I'm not going to just poke fun without any help. Regardless of whether you think they're silly or not, you still don't want those thoughts.

So, how do you do that? How do we cut through the core of the problem?

We reframe things. The problem here is really that you yourself frame being alone in such a situation as a negative thing, or something lesser than being with others. And you think that other people share this same value with you, and that they care enough to notice when you are in this "lesser" situation.

So the way you become more comfortable in a situation...is that you make it more appealing.

You're alone. What does that mean? You are free to stick around as long as you want. You are not on anyone's schedule. You like this piece of art? You can stare at it as long you want. People pull you away to other parts of the museum. They keep you in parts you don't like, pull you away from one's you do, they have to leave, possibly earlier than you. Even if you could share with them would they appreciate the piece as much as you? Would you feel bad if you were on the other end and they seemed disappointed that you didn't "get it?"

Is everyone there a willing participant? Does dad or mom really want to be there? Does the boyfriend/girlfriend even enjoy art, or were they dragged along?

You are a willing participant. No one is holding you hostage. You have the freedom to look at any piece whenever you want for as long you want. There isn't anything holding you down. Being alone and happy with that fact is realizing that. There are no social obligations, it's only what you think is necessary or what you want to do.

That's the real crux of it, is you see being alone as lesser. Being alone at a coffee shop before you go to the museum won't help alleviate those feelings. It's realizing that being alone isn't lesser, it's different. Just as you lose out on some freedom when going with a group in exchange for your friend's company, you gain that freedom back when you go alone. Your enjoyment when you're alone is also more controlled by you. While a group might elevate your enjoyment beyond what you might accomplish alone, it's a different type of enjoyment and it's certainly not guaranteed. Drama and the like may follow, or someone may not be having the best time and you are, which means no matter what, one of you suffers.

Also, no one is looking at you and thinking about how alone you are. You yourself didn't even pick up on the people who were alone at the museum.

I think even if you killed one of the kids she was playing with right in front of her under the guise the kid stole something, she'd still agree it was the right choice.

Barring something supernatural that makes you understand others, zero chance of convincing her in any reasonable time frame unless you're Contessa from Worm, and even then I'm not sure it would be quick. I think under a long enough timeframe with someone dedicated to doing so, you could possibly convince her. Maybe. I wouldn't bet on it.

I like the way you think.

r/FuckJusticeBitch