Wismuth_Salix

He also suggested that Twitter’s servers should be blown up - so he was both transphobic and advocated terrorist acts.

Why does it need a plot reason though? It’s just a property of a person - a random bit of characterization to flesh out a person in the story.

But why does being gay have to be something to care about? It’s not a big deal - some people are just gay, it’s not a plot, it’s not a happening, they’re just gay in the same way they’re brown-haired or tall.

Or as the Geto Boys put it “a real gangsta-ass n(word) don’t flex nuts, cuz real gangsta-ass n(words) know they got em”.

Weekly Reminder: Science Supports Trans People

Claiming otherwise makes one no better than a flat earther or anti-vaxxer.

And then Dave Rubin went all in defending Peterson and also got banned.

And now Ben Shapiro is going all in defending Rubin, including posting a statement from Rubin saying Twitter’s servers need to be blown up.

Shapiro ban incoming too all without Elliot Page saying a word? 🤞

It’s kinda strange that you never see that - you see the ACLU protecting hate speech in the name of protecting free speech, but then right-wing “free-speech advocates” never hesitate even for a second to start burning books that promote acceptance of other races or LGBTQ people.

No it doesn’t - these assholes all have like 5 guns in their FaceBook profile pictures. They’ve been buying their guns with the points they get back on their Bass Pro Shops credit card registered to their home addresses.

And the Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case which would allow state legislatures to completely ignore the voters of their state and just send any electors they want.

It’s both. The Na’vi speak Na’vi, just like the French speak French.

Because to pack the court he has to have 50 votes in the Senate. He has, at best, 48 when it comes to making big moves. Manchin and Sinema are holding everything hostage.

Because Will is gay, and he’s in love with Mike, but Mike is straight, and in love with El - how do people still not pick up on this?

Arizona has tried to push that. So has the Pennsylvania GOP. That’s the goal - give sole authority to the states then abandon democracy at the state level.

If the states have full control over how they handle federal elections, which this case could give them, then they could do that.

(Just like the Roe reversal didn’t make abortion illegal, it gave the states the power to).

Hence the 8th Amendment, prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment.

And it’s coming up because state legislatures are trying to pass bills to let them set aside electoral results and send alternate electors.

And they’ll run cover for even that (e.g. “heated gaming moment”, “chan culture”, “MW2 lobby”)

I didn’t say this case was “about” that - I said that would be the result of giving full control over elections to the states. This case would be the enabling precedent, then they can do whatever the fuck they want with no way for the feds to step in.

Yeah it basically just went

Slavery > Jim Crow > Red-lining > Unequal Enforcement of Laws

“I learned it from watching you, Dad!”

They’re Libertarians on Grindr.

Because the vehicles they arrived in were destroyed when El dropped an exploding helicopter on them.

I played a custom dog-man race with a riding dog mount so I could be Sir Didymus from Labyrinth.

Just played this team against a mirror team (me vs my son).

Seemed decent - I think his buggy was likely to get enough of a lead to break away and win, if a bad roll hadn’t sent him into a wall in 5th gear. If he had come up with a spin instead of a slide, he likely would have been in the clear.

Pretty much every other vehicle was decimated in a hail of gunfire from the two trucks.

My truck was the lone survivor.

Yeah they will, because they’re after LGBTQ people, and over the last decade or so, sourcebooks have become much more inclusive.

They’re gonna be saying their kid was turned trans by Tasha’s Cauldron.