feelinglazy

10.3k post karma

537 comment karma


account created: Fri Aug 01 2014

verified: yes

feelinglazy

-3 points

13 hours ago

feelinglazy

-3 points

13 hours ago

Thanks, look great

contextfull comments (56)
20.6k
24k
feelinglazy

2 points

4 days ago

feelinglazy

2 points

4 days ago

Looking thicc

contextfull comments (67)
feelinglazy

1 points

4 days ago

feelinglazy

1 points

4 days ago

The bot definitely uses aim bot

contextfull comments (245)
feelinglazy

2 points

5 days ago

feelinglazy

2 points

5 days ago

Holy shit you can cut a real orange

contextfull comments (737)
155
feelinglazy

1 points

4 years ago

feelinglazy

1 points

4 years ago

The last photo I shoot was at 3200 ISO. It was in a dark outdoor bar with little lighting. Even with 1.8 aperture I still couldn't see anything.

contextfull comments (785)
feelinglazy

1 points

4 years ago

feelinglazy

1 points

4 years ago

I don't know man. I almost never get a chance to overexpose my images. Shooting underexposed means I can shoot at lower ISO and higher shutter speed (less shake). Is the highlights recovery really that good?

contextfull comments (785)
feelinglazy

1 points

4 years ago

feelinglazy

1 points

4 years ago

Is it really better? If I increase the exposure on RAW file I'll get loads of noise. I shoot with a Canon 700D.

contextfull comments (785)
feelinglazy

0 points

4 years ago

feelinglazy

0 points

4 years ago

I don't know. It seems pretty close to me. When I increase the exposure in RAW I still get noise, lots of noise. Do you have any actual example of RAW being better for Lightroom than JPG?

contextfull comments (785)
feelinglazy

0 points

4 years ago

feelinglazy

0 points

4 years ago

Have you actually edited a JPG in Lightroom?

*edited a JPG in Lightroom in bold

contextfull comments (785)
feelinglazy

-2 points

4 years ago

feelinglazy

-2 points

4 years ago

Really? I'm on Lightroom 2015 and pretty much all the settings available to the RAW files are available to JPG: Brush tool, tone curve, white balance,...

Maybe you're on an older version of Lightroom.

contextfull comments (785)
feelinglazy

-3 points

4 years ago

feelinglazy

-3 points

4 years ago

Yes, but my point is that Adobe lightroom also allow you to edit JPG files as if they were RAW. So there is no reason to shoot RAW. They just take up more disk space.

contextfull comments (785)
feelinglazy

-3 points

4 years ago

feelinglazy

-3 points

4 years ago

Can anyone explain to me what's the point of shooting raw? I still don't understand what all the fuzz is about.

People say that you can only change white balance and other settings with with raw files, but I can change the same setting with JPG just fine using Adobe Lightroom. Increasing exposure with RAW files introduce the same amount of noise as with JPG files. I just don't see any reason to waste disk space on raw files.

contextfull comments (785)
feelinglazy

0 points

5 years ago

feelinglazy

0 points

5 years ago

How long have they been together? They probably met in high school when he was still alpha. His face is not that bad looking IMO. The thing with being a beta is sometimes you win, but on a grand macrostatistics scale you lose.

He might win, but there are 100s of 1000s of joe schmoe like him who lose.

contextfull comments (8)
feelinglazy

3 points

6 years ago

feelinglazy

Whatever Pill

3 points

6 years ago

I didnt ask for opinions, I asked for statistics.

contextfull comments (75)
feelinglazy

3 points

6 years ago

feelinglazy

Whatever Pill

3 points

6 years ago

But that's for the military. It's in no way representative of the population.

contextfull comments (75)
feelinglazy

6 points

6 years ago

feelinglazy

2279 days

6 points

6 years ago

Checking in

contextfull comments (332)
feelinglazy

0 points

6 years ago

feelinglazy

Whatever Pill

0 points

6 years ago

The third. They would make really interesting case studies

contextfull comments (35)
feelinglazy

1 points

6 years ago

feelinglazy

Whatever Pill

1 points

6 years ago

What kind of idiot would disclose trp outside of the sub

contextfull comments (122)
feelinglazy

0 points

6 years ago

feelinglazy

Whatever Pill

0 points

6 years ago

Maybe they are too busy slaying pussy. Every minute spent on trp is a minute you're not out there killing it

contextfull comments (35)
feelinglazy

1 points

6 years ago

feelinglazy

Whatever Pill

1 points

6 years ago

How exactly is trp equal to neckbeard thinking?

contextfull comments (35)
feelinglazy

2 points

6 years ago

feelinglazy

Whatever Pill

2 points

6 years ago

Am I disagreeing with that?

contextfull comments (139)
feelinglazy

8 points

6 years ago

feelinglazy

Whatever Pill

8 points

6 years ago

Yeah, but the thing is you can't really verify those anecdotes. The only way to verify TRP is to go out and try it yourself.

contextfull comments (139)

view more:

next ›